hi folks,

It looks like we are closing in on the 0.11 release -- I have spent a
bunch of time gardening the backlog.

https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12343066

There are quite a few open patches still and housekeeping items
remaining. If you can help complete some of these issues this week,
please take a look and assign yourself to the issue.

I reckon we need this whole week to get into release-ready shape. Any
reason why we could not have a release vote next week?

Thanks,
Wes
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 2:31 AM Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I will also go over the release and add items. For my personal goal for 0.11, 
> I want to have predicate pushdown for Parquet files working. This means that 
> we should be able to determine in Python code what the relevant RowGroups in 
> a file are as well as filtering a Table given the set of predicates. Thus we 
> want to have a pyarrow.parquet.read_table variant that takes in a set of 
> predicates in disjunctive normal form and returns a (possibly empty) table 
> with only the rows that match the predicates. Please be aware when of this 
> when moving issues to 0.12.
>
> Uwe
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018, at 9:01 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> > I know it seems like we just released 0.10, but we are already 75
> > issues deep in 0.11 and have addressed a number of issues that
> > surfaced with 0.10
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12343066
> >
> > I suggest that we plan to release again the week of September 10. That
> > will be a slow week for me anyway because of the Strata conference in
> > NYC. This gives us enough time to resolve the outstanding packaging
> > issues and to complete the parquet-cpp merge and associated packaging
> > changes needed there.
> >
> > I will start curating the backlog next week to move anything
> > definitely aspirational to 0.12 so we can have a sense of the must-do
> > work for 0.11. Any help with backlog curation would be appreciated.
> >
> > Any other thoughts? In general I think we should be releasing every
> > 4-6 weeks for a while since the pace of progress is quite fast, and
> > many new users are coming into the ecosystem which will benefit from
> > more frequent releases.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Wes

Reply via email to