Ah, sorry. I think it would be good for the project to have a foot in the .NET ecosystem. I'm not able to comment more specifically, but the general idea sounds fine to me.
Regards Antoine. Le 11/10/2018 à 12:46, Wes McKinney a écrit : > This is a topic that bears discussion but I don't think it's related to > whether we accept this donation of IP into the Apache project. Let's > discuss that separately. > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 12:39 PM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Le 11/10/2018 à 12:34, Wes McKinney a écrit : >>> hi Antoine -- this is C# .NET, not C++. >> >> That is what I understood. My question was whether we want to continue >> gathering all independent implementations (I'm assuming the .NET >> implementation doesn't rely on the C++ libs?) in a single repo. >> >> Regards >> >> Antoine. >> >> >> >> So this is a new >>> implementation to stand alongside the other languages in the repo at >>> present. I would hope that we can eventually add C# integration tests >>> to the integration test matrix. >>> >>> - Wes >>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 6:12 AM Antoine Pitrou <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> If it's an independent implementation, does it make sense to integrate >>>> it in the current C++ Arrow repository? AFAIK, the main point is to >>>> run integration tests. On the other hand, it doesn't scale very well >>>> to integrate all implementations in a single repo. >>>> >>>> It could still be under the Apache Arrow umbrella, but under its own >>>> repository. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> Antoine. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 05:26:22 -0400 >>>> Wes McKinney <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Do others have some opinions about this? I think it would be great to >>>>> bring in folks from the .NET community. Since there is also a Parquet >>>>> .NET library available (https://github.com/elastacloud/parquet-dotnet) >>>>> there may be some interesting collaborations. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Wes >>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:58 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson >>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I planned on contributing long term in an open-source capacity >> separate from my employer, but I imagine spending professional time as our >> product evolves. I don't have an Apache ID at the moment; I also forgot to >> include that in my ICLA, although I specified in my submission to the >> secretary the ID(s) I prefer. >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Wes McKinney [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, October 9, 2018 12:04 PM >>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>> Subject: Re: Apache Arrow .NET implementation >>>>>> >>>>>> hi Christopher, >>>>>> >>>>>> This is great to hear. Do you and your colleagues have plans to >> continue developing it if the donation is accepted into Apache Arrow? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Wes >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 12:01 PM Christopher S. Hutchinson < >> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I am writing to announce that my employer (Feyen Zylstra LLC) has >> developed an implementation of Apache Arrow targeting .NET Standard. We are >> donating this implementation to the Apache Software Foundation. The source >> code is available for review on GitHub: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://github.com/feyenzylstra/apache-arrow >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Please let me know if you have any questions. Feel free to leave >> issues on GitHub, and happy voting! >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >
