Dimitris Lekkas created ARROW-5069: -------------------------------------- Summary: Implement direct support for shared memory arrow columns Key: ARROW-5069 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-5069 Project: Apache Arrow Issue Type: New Feature Components: C++ Environment: Linux Reporter: Dimitris Lekkas Fix For: 0.14.0
I consider the option of memory-mapping columns to shared memory to be valuable. Such option will be triggered if specific metadata are supplied. Given that many data frames backed by arrow are used for machine learning I guess we could somehow benefit from treating differently the data (most likely data buffer columns) that will be fed into the GPUs/FPGAs. To enable such change we would need to address the following issues: First, we need each column to hold an integer value representing its associated file descriptor. This field has meaning only in the context of same process and should not be transmitted when performing IPC. Instead, the application developer could retrieve the file-name from the file descriptor (i.e fstat syscall) and inform another application to reference that file or inform an FPGA to DMA that memory-area. We also need to support variable buffer alignment (restricted to powers-of-2 of course) when initiating an arrow::AllocateBuffer() call. By inspecting the current implementation, the alignment size is fixed at 64 bytes and to change that value a recompilation is required [1]. To justify the above suggestion, major FPGA vendors (i.e Xilinx) benefit heavily from page-aligned buffers since their device memory is 4KB [2]. Particularly, Xilinx warns users if they attempt to memcpy a non-page-aligned buffer from CPU memory to FPGA's memory [3]. I am open to discuss any suggestions, improvements or concerns. [1]: [https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/cpp/src/arrow/memory_pool.cc#L40] [2]: [https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/SDAccel/memory-alignment-when-allocating-emmory-in-SDAccel/td-p/887593] [3]: [https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=884615&tstart=0] -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005)