I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-5091

On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 9:53 AM ming zhang <ming.zhang.ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> it is not a big deal for sure. it is just help new comer to build a mental
> model quicker. code is for reader anyway.
>
> i will submit a patch later
>
> thanks
> ming
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 10:14 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't have a problem with the name personally but writing a patch
> > would be the next step.
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 8:59 AM ming zhang <ming.zhang.ch...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > looks like we are ok with FlighInfo. what is the next step? should I
> > write
> > > a proposal or submit a patch? i just start working around Arrow Flight
> > and
> > > need to learn the procedure here. thanks
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 9:48 AM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Oh, you're right.  The corresponding method is already named
> > GetFlightInfo.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Antoine.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Le 02/04/2019 à 15:37, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > > > > FlightGetInfo is a message so if we are going to change the name, we
> > > > > should make it more noun-like, such as FlightInfo.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 7:08 AM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> If we change it, I vote for GetFlightInfo.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Regards
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Antoine.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Le 02/04/2019 à 14:07, ming zhang a écrit :
> > > > >>> Hi
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> The name of FlightGetInfo is kind of strange. It is a
> > noun+verb+noun,
> > > > which
> > > > >>> is not consistent with others like FlightData, FlightDescriptor,
> > etc.
> > > > The
> > > > >>> 1st impression is that this is a method, not a message, since other
> > > > methods
> > > > >>> are verb+noun.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Should FlightGetInfo to be FlightInfo?
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> Thanks
> > > > >>> Ming
> > > > >>>
> > > >
> >

Reply via email to