hi Kou, Either solution you propose seems OK to me. Regenerating the APT metadata and marking the packages as non-official would be OK if it saves you and others the effort of doing a full release. We made enough process changes from 0.12.0 to 0.13.0 that it seemed inevitable for some things to break.
Thanks, Wes On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:54 PM Kouhei Sutou <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Our APT repositories for Debian and Ubuntu are broken: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-5087 > > It seems that APT metadata (package list) is only broken. So > we can fix this by re-generate APT metadata. We can still > use voted binary artifacts. > > Can we re-generate APT metadata and upload it without vote? > Or should we create 0.13.1 for it? > Or can we re-generate APT metadata and upload it without > vote by adding "(Unofficial)" mark to > https://arrow.apache.org/install/ ? > > > I'll add verification scripts for APT and YUM repositories > to prevent this problem in future releases: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-5094 > > > Thanks, > -- > kou
