Thanks everyone. I will finalize the PR. The Java needs to be rebased
and I need to add the c++ implementation.
On Monday, April 8, 2019, Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The vote carries with 4 binding +1 votes.
>
> Micah, what are the next steps?
> Are You going to finalize the PR?
>
> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 11:13 AM Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 6, 2019, at 2:44 AM, Kouhei Sutou wrote:
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > In <CAKa9qDm+aO-9q_6x3XCXCJ5wOuqZb3spuLtGOY4mi3v5AB=p...@mail.gmail.com
> >
> > > "[VOTE] Add new DurationInterval Type to Arrow Format" on Wed, 3 Apr
> > > 2019 07:59:56 -0700,
> > > Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'd like to propose a change to the Arrow format to support a new
> > duration
> > > > type. Details below. Threads on mailing list around discussion.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > // An absolute length of time unrelated to any calendar artifacts.
> > For the
> > > > purposes
> > > > /// of Arrow Implementations, adding this value to a Timestamp ("t1")
> > > > naively (i.e. simply summing
> > > > /// the two number) is acceptable even though in some cases the
> > resulting
> > > > Timestamp (t2) would
> > > > /// not account for leap-seconds during the elapsed time between "t1"
> > and
> > > > "t2". Similarly, representing
> > > > /// the difference between two Unix timestamp is acceptable, but
> would
> > > > yield a value that is possibly a few seconds
> > > > /// off from the true elapsed time.
> > > > ///
> > > > /// The resolution defaults to
> > > > /// millisecond, but can be any of the other supported TimeUnit
> values
> > as
> > > > /// with Timestamp and Time types. This type is always represented
> as
> > > > /// an 8-byte integer.
> > > > table DurationInterval {
> > > > unit: TimeUnit = MILLISECOND;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Please vote whether to accept the changes. The vote will be open
> > > > for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Accept these changes to the Flight protocol
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 Do not accept the changes because...
> > >
> >
>
