I just moved https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-5850 from 1.0.0 to 0.14.1.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 8:12 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > To limit uncertainty, I'm going to start preparing a 0.14.1 patch > release branch. I will update the list with the patches that are being > cherry-picked. If other folks could give me a list of other PRs that > need to be backported I will add them to the list. Any JIRA that needs > to be included should have the "0.14.1" fix version added so we can > keep track > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 9:48 PM Joris Van den Bossche > <jorisvandenboss...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I personally prefer 0.14.1 over 0.15.0. I think that is clearer in > > communication, as we are fixing regressions of the 0.14.0 release. > > > > (but I haven't been involved much in releases, so certainly no strong > > opinion) > > > > Joris > > > > > > Op wo 10 jul. 2019 om 15:07 schreef Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>: > > > > > hi folks, > > > > > > Are there any opinions / strong feelings about the two options: > > > > > > * Prepare patch 0.14.1 release from a maintenance branch > > > * Release 0.15.0 out of master > > > > > > Aside from the Parquet forward compatibility issues we're still > > > discussing, and Eric's C# patch PR 4836, are there any other issues > > > that need to be fixed before we go down one of these paths? > > > > > > Would anyone like to help with release management? I can do so if > > > necessary, but I've already done a lot of release management :) > > > > > > - Wes > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 4:13 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Eric -- of course! > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2019, 4:03 PM Eric Erhardt < > eric.erha...@microsoft.com.invalid> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Can we propose getting changes other than Python or Parquet related > > > into this release? > > > >> > > > >> For example, I found a critical issue in the C# implementation > that, if > > > possible, I'd like to get included in a patch release. > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4836 > > > >> > > > >> Eric > > > >> > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2019 7:59 AM > > > >> To: dev@arrow.apache.org > > > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Need for 0.14.1 release due to Python package > > > problems, Parquet forward compatibility problems > > > >> > > > >> On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 12:02 AM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > Hi, > > > >> > > > > >> > > If the problems can be resolved quickly, I should think we > could cut > > > >> > > an RC for 0.14.1 by the end of this week. The RC could either > be cut > > > >> > > from a maintenance branch or out of master -- any thoughts about > > > >> > > this (cutting from master is definitely easier)? > > > >> > > > > >> > How about just releasing 0.15.0 from master? > > > >> > It'll be simpler than creating a patch release. > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> I'd be fine with that, too. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > >> > Thanks, > > > >> > -- > > > >> > kou > > > >> > > > > >> > In <CAJPUwMBPaz7zLBkBcVo-r= > > > nmvwuy8wxxddcctobuuamy4ee...@mail.gmail.com> > > > >> > "[DISCUSS] Need for 0.14.1 release due to Python package > problems, > > > Parquet forward compatibility problems" on Mon, 8 Jul 2019 11:32:07 > -0500, > > > >> > Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> > > hi folks, > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Perhaps unsurprisingly due to the expansion of our Python > packages, > > > >> > > a number of things are broken in 0.14.0 that we should fix > sooner > > > >> > > than the next major release. I'll try to send a complete list to > > > >> > > this thread to give a status within a day or two. Other > problems may > > > >> > > arise in the next 48 hours as more people install the package. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > If the problems can be resolved quickly, I should think we > could cut > > > >> > > an RC for 0.14.1 by the end of this week. The RC could either > be cut > > > >> > > from a maintenance branch or out of master -- any thoughts about > > > >> > > this (cutting from master is definitely easier)? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Would someone (who is not Kou) be able to assist with creating > the > > > RC? > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Thanks, > > > >> > > Wes > > > >
