Hi, No more opinions?
If there are no more opinions, we'll use the current SO versioning schema committed by https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4801 for 1.0.0. The current versioning schema is the following: * 1.0.0 -> libarrow.100.0.0 * 1.1.0 -> libarrow.101.0.0 * 1.2.0 -> libarrow.102.0.0 I'll update .deb package names when we decide this. Thanks, -- kou In <cahm19a6iefcxshhctvnccqzqz4ehncaq8mj-48lfxhzdf9j...@mail.gmail.com> "Re: [DISCUSS] C++ SO versioning with 1.0.0" on Thu, 4 Jul 2019 13:55:03 +0200, Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Created a PR with the versioning scheme described by @Kou. > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4801 > > We can change later (but before the next release) to unblock > the failing CI builds. > > On Thu, Jul 4, 2019 at 12:51 PM Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > >> On Thu, 4 Jul 2019 09:50:10 +0200 >> Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Could We add a temporary solution and perhaps change the versioning >> schema >> > later? >> > I'm asking because all of our c++ based CI builds are failing now. >> >> Wow, thanks for pointing out. >> Indeed: >> https://travis-ci.org/apache/arrow/builds/554118250 >> >> """ >> CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:47 (message): >> Need to implement SO version generation for Arrow 1.0+ >> -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! >> """ >> >> Regards >> >> Antoine. >> >> >>
