The pyarrow windows wheels for version 0.14.1 are no longer available. On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 4:19 PM Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ok, I'm deleting the 0.14.1 windows wheels then. > > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 3:40 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I agree that we should not let people install broken wheels. >> >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 8:38 AM Krisztián Szűcs >> <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Although we have a quick fix for that [1] and the fixed wheels will be >> > available soon [2] but sadly pypi doesn't support the update of already >> > uploaded packages. >> > >> > We have three options: >> > 1. delete the 0.14.1 windows wheels >> > 2. draft a post release [3] only for the windows wheels, last time we >> did it >> > it broke a lot of users' workflows >> > 3. create a 0.14.2 release >> > >> > In my opinion we should stick with option 1. >> > >> > [1]: >> > >> https://github.com/kszucs/arrow/commit/3b3f12c97be3436bc78374cac199a909b8f5edfe >> > [2]: >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6015?focusedCommentId=16890990&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-16890990 >> > [3]: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0440/#post-releases >> > >> > On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 3:27 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > As we just found in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-6015, >> > > our 0.14.1 wheels have more problems (this time on Windows), so more >> > > evidence that we don't have the bandwidth to properly support these >> > > packages. >> > > >> > > On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 3:08 PM Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > I think what you suggest is highly dependent on who does the work. >> > > > >> > > > The first question is who is willing to do the work. Given that >> they are >> > > > volunteers, they'd probably need to propose something like this >> (but with >> > > > there own flavors/choices) and then we'd have to figure out how this >> > > > communicated to users (especially in the context that the same >> package >> > > > would potentially have different capabilities if used pip vs conda). >> > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 8:52 PM Suvayu Ali < >> fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > Hi Wes, others, >> > > > > >> > > > > A few thoughts from a user. Firstly, I completely understand your >> > > > > frustration. I myself have delved into a bit of packaging for >> many >> > > > > scientific computing packages, like ROOT from CERN, although not >> at the >> > > > > scale of users that you face here. >> > > > > >> > > > > AIU, wheels are a Python-first spec, whereas Arrow is a C++ first >> > > library, >> > > > > with python bindings. I feel this is what causes the friction in >> the >> > > build >> > > > > chain for wheels. That said, I would like to propose the >> following. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 10:06:41PM -0500, Wes McKinney wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > * Our wheel become much more complex due to Flight (requiring >> gRPC, >> > > > > > OpenSSL, and other dependencies) and Gandiva (requiring LLVM and >> > > more) >> > > > > >> > > > > Disable the more advanced features and release reduced feature set >> > > wheels, >> > > > > say, only with: >> > > > > 1. core data structures, Table, etc, >> > > > > 2. various serialisation support (parquet, orc, etc), and >> > > > > 3. plasma. >> > > > > >> > > > > My justification being, it covers a significant proportion of the >> > > > > relatively non-expert usecases. (1) covers the interaction with >> other >> > > > > Python libraries, particularly pandas, (2) covers most I/O >> > > requirements, >> > > > > and plasma along with providing a way to manage Arrow objects >> > > in-memory for >> > > > > more advanced architectures, it also serves as a relatively simple >> > > bridge >> > > > > to other languages. Any users requiring Gandiva or Flight on >> Python >> > > could >> > > > > easily "upgrade" to the conda-forge releases. >> > > > > >> > > > > What do you think? >> > > > > >> > > > > Cheers, >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Suvayu >> > > > > >> > > > > Open source is the future. It sets us free. >> > > > > >> > > >> >
