+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, 8:36 AM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> My vote +1 (binding)
>
> On Friday, August 16, 2019, David Li <li.david...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks Ryan for working on this!
> >
> > Best,
> > David
> >
> > On 8/16/19, Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > Ryan Murray has proposed adding a GetFlightSchema RPC [1] to the Arrow
> > > Flight Protocol [2]. The purpose of this RPC is to allow decoupling
> > schema
> > > and endpoint retrieval as provided by the GetFlightInfo RPC. The new
> > > definition provided is:
> > >
> > > message SchemaResult {
> > > // Serialized Flatbuffer Schema message.
> > > bytes schema = 1;
> > > }
> > > rpc GetSchema(FlightDescriptor) returns (SchemaResult) {}
> > >
> > > Ryan has also provided a PR demonstrating implementation of the new RPC
> > [3]
> > > in Java, C++ and Python which can be reviewed and merged after this
> > > addition is approved.
> > >
> > > Please vote whether to accept the addition. The vote will be open for
> at
> > > least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Accept this addition to the Flight protocol
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not accept the changes because...
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Micah
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zLdFYikk3owbKpHvJrARLMlmYpi-
> > Ef6OJy7H90MqViA/edit
> > > [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/format/Flight.proto
> > > [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/4980
> > >
> >
>
