Hi, In <21183bb1-813f-b35b-b391-3f52ef2e6...@python.org> "Re: [DISCUSS] Result vs Status" on Sat, 5 Oct 2019 12:23:05 +0200, Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:
>> OK, so what could more context be provided on: >> >>> From the discussion in the sync call, it seems reasonable to require that: >>> Public APIs which are likely to be directly wrapped in a binding should not >>> use Result<> to the exclusion of Status. An equivalent Status API should >>> always be provided for ease of binding. > > I don't know, sorry :-) I wasn't on the sync call. We don't need Status API for bindings. We already use complex types such as std::shared_ptr in our API. Bindings need C++ feature for complex types. So we don't need to care about Result<> or Status. Thanks, -- kou
