Note that 20 builds are running on master only, including windows, macos,
and documentation builds.

On Mon, Nov 11, 2019, 12:33 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:

>
> Ah, no, sorry, I read wrongly.  It's 20 builds total.  That's still a
> lot, IMO.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le 11/11/2019 à 12:32, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
> >
> > A C++ change will end up triggering 38 builds (C++, Python, Ruby, R)...
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
> >
> >
> > Le 11/11/2019 à 12:25, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> >> That's too many for C++ and Python changes in my opinion. Let's focus
> >> on getting the PR merged and then we can address this problem
> >>
> >> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 3:21 AM Krisztián Szűcs
> >> <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> It depends on the change:
> >>>
> >>> - [C++]: 20
> >>>
> https://github.com/kszucs/arrow/commit/5654da07c21a7cf6a0e08894f4bf4e7aaa70ed26/checks?check_suite_id=304713473
> >>> - [Python]: 8
> >>>
> https://github.com/kszucs/arrow/commit/5084c23f4d8b0fe05f1056808e7066aadbf0033e/checks?check_suite_id=304716138
> >>> - [Ruby]: 5
> >>>
> https://github.com/kszucs/arrow/commit/e90e92514f69b0734e8126a949858476bfb70c1a/checks?check_suite_id=304717369
> >>> - [JS]: 6
> >>>
> https://github.com/kszucs/arrow/commit/f27d6500f628c152c732f2372beae15a34f088e9/checks?check_suite_id=304718837
> >>> - [R]: 5
> >>>
> https://github.com/kszucs/arrow/commit/eaec66cbde923687beebe31114dea6d0410043c6/checks?check_suite_id=304719993
> >>> - [Rust]: 6
> >>>
> https://github.com/kszucs/arrow/commit/0c52ad15a54e78fdd1fe797668ebf0cdfbf6f4ab/checks?check_suite_id=304720884
> >>> - [Go]: 7
> >>>
> https://github.com/kszucs/arrow/commit/30ab7f5e8cf6373774ce6ea75b0473da5ec808a3/checks?check_suite_id=304722182
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 2:19 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Just to be sure, if this PR is merged, how many GHA tasks will be run
> >>>> on each commit to master?
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 12:07 PM Krisztián Szűcs
> >>>> <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I've trimmed down the number of triggered builds on pull requests by
> >>>>> converting them to run on master only or cron builds. Alsoe added
> >>>>> the action filters including the changed path patterns. I've also
> >>>>> collected ~30 follow up JIRAs aggregating the problems I came across
> >>>>> during the refactor and possible further improvements and
> optimizations
> >>>>> like caching.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The PR is ready to be merged [1]. I expect multiple issues after
> merging
> >>>>> the PR, despite that I was trying to port everything thoroughly.
> >>>>> The changeset is simply too big, but we need to start somewhere, and
> >>>>> sooner is better.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5589
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 10:21 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> hi Krisz -- I just left comments on the PR. This definitely looks
> like
> >>>>>> a good step forward. My main comment is that I think there are too
> >>>>>> many C++/Python tasks to run on an each-commit basis. Ideally many
> of
> >>>>>> these would be run nightly. There is also a certain amount of
> >>>>>> redundancy in rebuilding the C++ library multiple times before
> running
> >>>>>> each dependent set of tests, whereas in Travis we build the C++
> >>>>>> library once then test both C++ and Python. If there is sufficient
> >>>>>> number of builders then perhaps it doesn't matter so much
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It seems there are a few things, like action filtering (similar to
> >>>>>> "detect-changes.py") based on what was changed that would need to
> get
> >>>>>> done before this can be merged.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - Wes
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 7:25 PM Krisztián Szűcs
> >>>>>> <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> During the release of 0.15.1-RC0 I literally had to wait days
> >>>>>>> to ensure that the Travis, Appveyor and Crossbow builds
> >>>>>>> were all passing for the release branch. Additionally each
> >>>>>>> newly added patch was delaying the process by 8 hrs or so
> >>>>>>> (actually felt like 16).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Recently I've been working on to incorporate the advantages
> >>>>>>> of the Buildbot setup into our current docker-compose
> >>>>>>> configuration, including support for multiple architectures
> >>>>>>> and platforms, reusing docker images and caching dependency
> >>>>>>> installation steps. It tries to follow the semantics of ursabot,
> >>>>>>> but using only docker-compose and tiny shell scripts.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This refactoring also includes GitHub Actions workflows for
> >>>>>>> Windows and macOS as well, reusing the same (bash) builds
> >>>>>>> scripts. The docker configuration and the scripts are CI agnostic.
> >>>>>>> Last but not least, I've managed to clean up a lot of things
> >>>>>>> including every travis builds, and three Appveyor builds.
> >>>>>>> As an example the ci [3] and dev [4] folders got much cleaner.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The majority of the builds are passing [2], but due to the size
> >>>>>>> of the pull request [1] reviews for relevant workflows like the
> >>>>>>> JavaScript, C#, Rust, JNI, etc. would be much appreciated.
> >>>>>>> I'll be on vacation until Wednesday, but will try to respond on
> >>>>>>> both GH and the ML.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks, Krisztian
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5589
> >>>>>>> [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/275685241
> >>>>>>> [3]:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/9c7e7289b9c9486c13a02e7cb5682a0f9f274ec6/ci
> >>>>>>> [4]:
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/tree/9c7e7289b9c9486c13a02e7cb5682a0f9f274ec6/dev
>

Reply via email to