IMO while "nonexistent" is the right word, neither are particularly readable or obvious in code. Is there a better word/phrase?
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 5:34 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I found that we use both "nonexistent" and "non-existent" in > our C++ code base. I think that we should use one of them > instead of mixing them. > > "nonexistent": > > * Public API: > * cpp/src/plasma/: plasma::PlasmaErrorCode::PlasmaObjectNonexistent > > "non-existent": > > * Public API: > * cpp/src/arrow/filesystem/: arrow::fs::FileType::NonExistent > * Internal: > * cpp/src/arrow/util/io_util.h: allow_non_existent > * Test: > * cpp/src/gandiva/tests/: non_existent_function > > > Which should we use? > (Personally, I prefer "nonexistent" to "non-existent".) > > > Thanks, > -- > kou >
