Hi Jacques, ARROW-4526 is interesting. I would like to try to resolve it. Thanks a lot for the information.
Best, Liya Fan On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 6:14 AM Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> wrote: > The third ticket I was commenting on was ARROW-4526. > > Fan, do you want to take a shot at that one? > > On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 8:16 PM Fan Liya <liya.fa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Jacques, > > > > I am interested in the issues, and if it is possible, I would like to try > > to resolve them. > > > > Thanks. > > > > Liya Fan > > > > On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 7:16 AM Jacques Nadeau <jacq...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > > I identified three things in the java library that I think are top of > > mind > > > and should be fixed before 1.0 to avoid weird incompatibility changes > in > > > the java apis (technical debt). I've tagged them as pre-1.0 as I don't > > > exactly see what is the right way to tag/label a target release for a > > > ticket. > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-7495?jql=labels%20%3D%20pre-1.0 > > > > > > For the three tickets I identified, does anyone have interest in trying > > to > > > resolve? > > > > > > thanks, > > > Jacques > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 11:55 AM Neal Richardson < > > > neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > Happy new year! As we look ahead to 2020, it's time to start > mobilizing > > > for > > > > the Arrow 1.0 release. At 0.15, I believe we decided that our next > > > release > > > > should be 1.0, and it's been a couple of months since 0.15, so we're > > due > > > to > > > > release again this month, give or take. (See [1] for when we most > > > recently > > > > discussed doing 1.0 back in June, or if you're a fan of ancient > > history, > > > > see [2] for a similar discussion from July 2017.) > > > > > > > > Since there appeared to be consensus before that it is time for 1.0, > > > let's > > > > discuss how to get it done. One first step would be to make sure that > > > we've > > > > identified all format/specification issues we think we must resolve > > > before > > > > declaring 1.0. [3] shows 3 "blockers" for the 1.0 release already. > > There > > > > are an additional 14 "Format" issues ([4]); perhaps some of those > > should > > > > also be labeled blockers for 1.0. > > > > > > > > It would be great if folks could review Jira in their areas of > > expertise > > > > and make sure everything essential for 1.0 is ticketed and > prioritized > > > > appropriately. Once we've identified the required tasks for making a > > 1.0 > > > > release, we can work together on burning those down. > > > > > > > > Neal > > > > > > > > [1]: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/44a7a3d256ab5dbd62da6fe45b56951b435697426bf4adedb6520907@%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > [2]: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0aca401e8906e1adbb37228b38569a9a7736b864da854007dad111c3%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > [3]: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Arrow+1.0.0+Release > > > > [4]: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20ARROW%20AND%20status%20in%20(%22In%20Review%22%2C%20Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%201.0.0%20AND%20component%20%3D%20Format > > > > > > > > > >
