Hi Andy, I think `cargo update` is the correct approach to resolve this issue. Yes, we've got quite a bit of backlog in Rust, but we should initiate the process to adopt parquet-format with Chao and Ivan's approval post 0.16.
In the interim we could fix the thrift dependency issue upstream (as that could be quicker). I'm hoping to make some time before 1.0.0 to update parquet to the latest format. On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, 18:01 Andy Grove, <andygrov...@gmail.com> wrote: > Apologies for showing up at the last minute but I'm now re-engaged in the > project after a bit of an absence and I noticed that we have some > dependency conflicts due to the parquet-format crate (not controlled by > Apache) using Thrift 0.12 whereas the parquet crate uses Thrift 0.13 and > they require different versions of the byteorder crate. > > However, I have seen that not everyone is running into this issue, which > confuses me. Maybe this is related to cached dependencies and the fact that > we do not check in Cargo.lock (which we should not need to since this > project is a library rather than a binary). > > See ARROW-7563 and ARROW-7507 for more context. > > I have created a PR against the parquet-format crate and hopefully, we can > get a new version published. > > We need to get this crate under ASF control IMHO. See ARROW-6256. > > Andy. >
