+1 (binding) On 2020. Apr 24., Fri at 1:51, Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 2:35 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > In <cajpuwmdem1-5sudxzrwyfkhsdefssq8tbspgyicajhkbefu...@mail.gmail.com> > > "[VOTE] Add "trivial" RecordBatch body compression to Arrow IPC > > protocol" on Wed, 22 Apr 2020 19:24:09 -0500, > > Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have proposed adding a simple RecordBatch IPC message body > > > compression scheme (using either LZ4 or ZSTD) to the Arrow IPC > > > protocol in GitHub PR [1] as discussed on the mailing list [2]. This > > > is distinct from separate discussions about adding in-memory encodings > > > (like RLE-encoding) to the Arrow columnar format. > > > > > > This change is not forward compatible so it will not be safe to send > > > compressed messages to old libraries, but since we are still pre-1.0.0 > > > the consensus is that this is acceptable. We may separately consider > > > increasing the metadata version for 1.0.0 to require clients to > > > upgrade. > > > > > > Please vote whether to accept the addition. The vote will be open for > > > at least 72 hours. > > > > > > [ ] +1 Accept this addition to the IPC protocol > > > [ ] +0 > > > [ ] -1 Do not accept the changes because... > > > > > > Here is my vote: +1 > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Wes > > > > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/6707 > > > [2]: > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r58c9d23ad159644fca590d8f841df80d180b11bfb72f949d601d764b%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > >
