Le 29/04/2020 à 20:49, David Li a écrit : > > However, we noticed this doesn’t actually bring us the expected > benefits. Consider files A, B, and C being buffered in parallel; right > now, all I/O goes through an internal I/O pool, and so several > operations for each of the three files get added to the pool. However, > they get serviced in some random order, and so it’s possible for file > C to finish all its I/O operations before file B can. Then, a consumer > is unnecessarily stuck waiting for those to complete.
It would be good if you explained your use case a bit more precisely. Are you expecting the files to be read in a particular order? If so, why? Regards Antoine.
