>From the release milestone
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/ARROW/versions/12348202) it
looks like there are a few remaining issues

ARROW-8684 -- there is a PR but we don't understand why it works. If
we can't figure it out but the patch fixes the broken wheel issue we
may have to accept it for now
ARROW-8741: in progress
ARROW-8726: No patch yet available (does this need to block? since
this is a bug in bleeding edge functionality)

Who would be able to cut the patch release? Do you think it will be
possible to reduce the steps involved with producing this release to
ease the work required of the RM?

On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 7:30 AM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:
>
>
> There's also ARROW-8728 and ARROW-8704.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le 07/05/2020 à 14:25, Francois Saint-Jacques a écrit :
> > I'll add https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-8726 to the list.
> >
> > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 6:52 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry I haven't had enough coffee today.
> >>
> >> The patches that still need to be resolved AFAICT are ARROW-8684 and
> >> ARROW-8706 (AKA PARQUET-1857), so it will take a little while yet
> >>
> >> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 5:18 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I just added it to the milestone in JIRA. In general if you want to
> >>> add a patch to a patch release, you can go into JIRA and add the fix
> >>> version
> >>>
> >>> I think the most critical patches have all been merged now, is there a
> >>> reason to delay much longer in cutting a release? We might use the
> >>> opportunity to produce a slimmed down "Release Management for Patch
> >>> Releases" guide with some steps omitted (hopefully)
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 2:55 PM Paul Taylor <ptaylor.apa...@gmail.com> 
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Would it be possible to include the variant.hpp update
> >>>> <https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7053> for nvcc in 0.17.1?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>>
> >>>> Paul
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/4/20 4:17 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> >>>>> hi folks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We have accumulated a few regressions
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ARROW-8657 https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7089
> >>>>> ARROW-8694 https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7103
> >>>>>
> >>>>> there may be a few others.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I think we should try to make a "streamlined" patch release (after
> >>>>> surveying incoming bug reports for other serious regressions) if
> >>>>> possible focused on providing patched binaries to the impacted users
> >>>>> (in the above, this would be any user of the Parquet portion of the
> >>>>> C++ library). The hope would be to be able to trim down the work
> >>>>> required of a release manager in a normal major release in these
> >>>>> scenarios where we need to get out bugfixes sooner.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks
> >>>>> Wes

Reply via email to