I'll try to make PRs for the feature enum tonight.  I don't think this is a
blocker as there are other mechanisms to detect the current values listed.

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 10:37 AM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Aside from fixing nightly builds, which of the 25 issues remaining in
> the 1.0.0 milestone must be resolved in order to release? Speak now or
> forever hold your peace =)
>
> As one problem where I haven't seen activity, we have not implemented
> the Feature Enum anywhere, do we want to try to add simple
> implementations in C++ and/or Java?
>
> I hope we can cut a release candidate around Wednesday time frame if
> builds have stabilized.
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 3:02 PM Ryan Murray <rym...@dremio.com> wrote:
> >
> > I just submitted https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/7697 to update
> Docs
> > for Java type support for 1.0.0, docs probably are not a blocker but
> should
> > be an easy review.
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 7:19 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > hi David -- I agree with you, I just set ARROW-9265 to a Blocker and
> > > will spend some time reviewing today. We also need to validate and
> > > document the expected workflow for PySpark users who upgrade to
> > > pyarrow=1.x and need to run in a Spark cluster that's using an older
> > > Arrow Java library
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 12:44 PM David Li <li.david...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I would submit that https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9265
> > > > and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-9362 should also be
> > > > considered blockers, or users are going to have a hard time
> migrating.
> > > > Also, without these PRs, no implementation currently actually writes
> > > > V5 metadata by default.
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > > On 7/9/20, Neal Richardson <neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > Following up on this. Are we still on track to cut a release
> candidate
> > > on
> > > > > Monday?
> > > > >
> > > > > Some specific calls to action:
> > > > >
> > > > > * Looking at the release wiki page (
> > > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Arrow+1.0.0+Release
> > > ),
> > > > > there are still 58 unstarted issues tagged for 1.0. Half of those
> are
> > > Rust
> > > > > issues that haven't been updated in over a month, so I suspect they
> > > aren't
> > > > > going to get resolved this week. Please do review the backlog and
> bump
> > > to
> > > > > 2.0 anything that isn't going to happen now.
> > > > >
> > > > > * There are also 5 issues listed as blockers. It's not clear to me
> that
> > > > > they're necessarily release blocking, that they're worth holding
> this
> > > > > release for, but if you feel strongly that they do and need more
> time
> > > to
> > > > > get them done, please speak up.
> > > > >
> > > > > * It appears that the various format changes from the past couple
> of
> > > weeks
> > > > > have gone through, and remaining tasks are not labeled as
> blockers. If
> > > > > there is something that you think *should* be considered a blocker,
> > > please
> > > > > indicate it as one.
> > > > >
> > > > > Neal
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 1:09 PM Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> hi folks,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I hope you and your families are all well.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> We're heading into a holiday weekend here in the US -- I would
> guess
> > > > >> given the state of the backlog and nightly builds that the
> earliest we
> > > > >> could contemplate making the release will be the week of July 13.
> That
> > > > >> should give enough time next week to resolve the code changes
> related
> > > > >> to the Format votes under way along with other things that come
> up.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> In the meantime, if all stakeholders could please review the 1.0.0
> > > > >> backlog and remove issues that you do not believe will be
> completed in
> > > > >> the next 10 days with > 0.5 probability, that would be very
> helpful to
> > > > >> know where things stand viz-a-viz cutting an RC
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thank you,
> > > > >> Wes
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:21 AM Wes McKinney <
> wesmck...@gmail.com>
> > > > >> wrote:
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > hi folks,
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Based on the previous discussions about release timelines, the
> > > window
> > > > >> > for the next major release would be around the week of July 6.
> Does
> > > > >> > this sound reasonable?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > I see that Neal has created a wiki page to help track the
> burndown
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Arrow+1.0.0+Release
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > There are currently 214 issues in the 1.0.0 backlog. Some of
> these
> > > are
> > > > >> > indeed blockers based on the criteria we've indicated for
> making the
> > > > >> > 1.0.0 release. Would project stakeholders please review their
> parts
> > > of
> > > > >> > the backlog and remove issues that aren't likely to be
> completed in
> > > > >> > the next 21 days?
> > > > >> >
> > > > >> > Thanks,
> > > > >> > Wes
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to