Some benchmarks would be good as long as they are well-defined, reproducible, and not misleading (or "as not misleading as possible"). For example, people are often mentioning Arrow and Parquet in the same breath (e.g. "Arrow/Parquet" in your e-mail) when these are distinct technologies, but apparently this causes confusion.
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:22 PM kekronbekron <kekronbek...@protonmail.com.invalid> wrote: > > Please consider adding benchmarks or comparisons of sorts. > I don't know how doable this is but .. it'll be good to drive people away > from other storage formats in favour or Arrow/Parquet enterprise-wide. > > - KB > > ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ > On Tuesday, July 28, 2020 3:17 AM, Wes McKinney <wesmck...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks to Neal and others who helped with the website overhaul for the > > 1.0.0 release, definitely feels like a big improvement to me. > > > > What other things would we like to do with the website? For example, > > it might be nice to have a "call out" on the front page to a news item > > like the most recent code release, or some other way (than clicking > > "Blog" or "Get Arrow" -- which require more digging on mobile > > browsers) to funnel traffic either to blog posts or the latest > > release. > >
