Hi, Thanks a lot for driving this, Andrew.
I agree with what both of you wrote here :) Best, Jorge On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 6:06 PM Rémi Dettai <rdet...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great topics Andrew, to my knowledge nothing has been decided on these > topics. > > We also agreed last time that it would be nice to go round the table so > that each of us has an opportunity to present briefly its use case for the > Rust Arrow implementation. > > Remi > > Le dim. 24 janv. 2021 à 13:16, Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> a écrit > : > > > I would like to propose two items for discussion at the Rust sync up > > meeting on Wednesday, or comment via email if you would prefer: > > > > *Item 1: API Backwards compatibility expectations* > > What, if any, expectations should users of the Rust Arrow API have > > regarding having about needing to change their code when upgrading arrow? > > Should different parts of the library (eg. Arrow vs DataFusion, or > certain > > Arrow modules) have different expectations? > > > > *Item 2: What are the expectations for merging a PR?* > > Do we have (or want to have) a more formal set of criteria for merging > PRs? > > For example, Is a single PR approval enough? Is there any requirement on > > approvals (e.g. from a committer?) Is there some minimum time between > > approval and merge so others can comment, are there different people who > > should review / approve different parts of the code? > > > > I apologize if this is already written down somewhere, but I could not > find > > it. > > > > Andrew > > >
