Yes, we are not touching apache/arrow.

Does anyone know how to request permissions on github repos? We can't even
see "Settings" atm (we can push to master). A JIRA on INFRA?

Thanks,
Jorge




On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 5:54 PM Krisztián Szűcs <szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 5:47 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 18/04/2021 à 17:43, Krisztián Szűcs a écrit :
> > > I wouldn't overwrite the git history since there can be explicit
> > > commit references in other projects.
> > >
> > > Either way, please don't overwrite any of the branches until I'm
> > > working on the release.
> >
> > Ah, I think we're only talking about the arrow-rs repository here.
> We should definitely apply git filter branch on the rust repositories.
> >
> > If however the suggestion is to do it on the main Arrow repository, then
> > I'm entirely opposed to it.
> The other way around hasn't occurred to me, probably I'm too focused
> on apache/arrow repository at the moment.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 5:09 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Le 18/04/2021 à 16:36, Andy Grove a écrit :
> > >>> Hi Wes,
> > >>>
> > >>> We started looking at the documentation for git filter-branch and it
> > >>> recommends not to use it. It states that "git-filter-branch is
> riddled with
> > >>> gotchas resulting in various ways to easily corrupt repos or end up
> with a
> > >>> mess worse than what you started with:".
> > >>>
> > >>> I guess we can decide to run this at any time, so let's discuss this
> more
> > >>> once we have the repos building?
> > >>
> > >> A bare clone of Arrow seems to be about 81 MB (the .git directory, not
> > >> the checkout). That's not huge, but not tiny either. In the end it's
> > >> your decision, since the impacted people are the Rust contributors.
> > >>
> > >> As for `git filter-branch`, I have no experience with it, but if you
> run
> > >> it just once and check that the repo and its contents are still valid
> > >> afterwards (for example `git fsck --full`), you should be fine.
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >>
> > >> Antoine.
>

Reply via email to