+1. I will add that I'm supportive of abbreviated votes for the biweekly releases, so if you get the votes in a 24 hour window, then releasing to crates.io sounds fine to me. For major releases with breaking changes, allowing the full 72 hours seems prudent.
On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:02 PM Jorge Cardoso Leitão <jorgecarlei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > +1 > > Thanks a lot, Andrew! > > On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 2:04 AM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > In <CAFhtnRydN_j-0=zeke+hb0x9quwdtazn3bx6r1oeecwoaav...@mail.gmail.com> > > "[VOTE] [RUST] New release process for arrow-rs" on Tue, 11 May 2021 > > 18:16:14 -0400, > > Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote: > > > > > Per previous discussions, I would like to propose a new release process > > for > > > arrow-rs, releasing officially to crates.io every 2 weeks in addition to > > > the quarterly release of the other releases. > > > > > > The proposal is available as [1] , based on previous discussions [2][3] > > in > > > the mailing list and comments on the draft document [4]. > > > > > > Please vote in the following manner. The vote will be open for at least > > 72 > > > hours. > > > > > > [ ] +1 Implement the release process described in the proposal > > > [ ] +0 > > > [ ] -1 Do not implement the process because... > > > > > > Thank you for your patience and participation, > > > Andrew > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tMQ67iu8XyGGZuj--h9WQYB9inCk6c2sL_4xMTwENGc/edit?ts=60961758 > > > > > > [2] > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r6b9baf59e3cd1a91905b5f802057026dfa627f00507638b605a3ff1b%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > [3] > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r832296a5bdf8eb363ef1ed7012b8e2dde3fa6894e7fa925a66c6e791%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > [4] > > > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QTGah5dkRG0Z6Gny_QCHmqMg7L2HmcbEpRISsfNEhSA/edit?ts=60904ac1 > >
