That sounds like a good idea to me
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 11:33 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Do you think we should rename the existing arrow-4.1.0 directory or just
> > use the new name going forward?
>
> How about renaming the existing arrow-4.1.0 directory if we
> need to release Apache Arrow 4.1.0? (I don't think that we
> need to release Apache Arrow 4.1.0.)
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
> In <CAFhtnRzcjhgc3P2ym2K-TZ937atiOzF-Y=f8m5u-ng4zu3c...@mail.gmail.com>
> "Re: Release archive URL" on Thu, 27 May 2021 06:36:48 -0400,
> Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote:
>
> > Using a different prefix sounds like a good idea to me. I don't have any
> > preference between apache-arrow{-rs} and arrow-{rs}
> >
> > I am happy to make that change for future Rust releases if others agree.
> >
> > Do you think we should rename the existing arrow-4.1.0 directory or just
> > use the new name going forward?
> >
> > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 8:58 PM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I noticed that we use "arrow-" prefix for both Apache Arrow
> >> release and Apache Arrow Rust release:
> >>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/arrow/
> >>
> >> > KEYS
> >> > arrow-3.0.0/
> >> > arrow-4.0.0/
> >> > arrow-4.0.1/
> >> > arrow-4.1.0/
> >>
> >> How about using "arrow-rs-" for Apache Arrow Rust like
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/ ?
> >>
> >> (Should we use "apache-arrow-" prefix and "apache-arrow-rs-"
> >> prefix like https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/ ?)
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> kou
> >>
>
