hi Jorge — there is a Rust Slack channel? On that, I would just say to be vigilant about what communication takes place there (since Slack is semi-private) versus on channels that are being archived / mirrored to mailing lists. It's useful for coordination and quick questions but not a place to make make decisions.
Thanks, Wes On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 12:14 AM Jorge Cardoso Leitão <jorgecarlei...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > I agree that the communication improved a lot with moving the issues > to Github and slack, which made the sync call less relevant. > > Best, > Jorge > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 11:55 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote: > > > > I think dropping back from the Rust sync call and using the regular Arrow > > Sync call should that be necessary is a good idea > > > > Andrew > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 12:27 PM Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > I would like to propose canceling the bi-weekly Rust sync call, at least > > > in > > > its current form. > > > > > > The call has not been very active since we moved to the new GitHub > > > repositories and implemented some changes to the development process. It > > > seems that the Rust community is communicating well without the need for > > > this Rust-specific sync call, and we can always join the regular Arrow > > > sync > > > call if there are issues that need discussing. > > > > > > If there are no objections, I will create a PR soon to remove references > > > for this call from our documentation. > > > > > > Andy. > > >
