+1 on time variation. Please add me to to the invite. Thanks
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 9:49 PM Benson Muite <benson_mu...@emailplus.org> wrote: > New to this. A suggestion may be to consider two of the times, eg. 4:00 > UTC and 16:00 UTC perhaps alternating allowing geographic diversity in > joining convenience. > > On 9/20/21 6:45 AM, QP Hou wrote: > > 16 UTC works for me too. > > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 10:00 AM zied bf <zied.boufa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> HI everyone, > >> > >> Still new to the stack and as per @Remi mentioned a few details related > to > >> internal design of datafuision documents and discussion could help > >> newcomers to understand how to contribute and at least where to start to > >> grasp the full implementation details and potentially contribute. > >> > >> I would vote for 16:00 UTC. > >> > >> Best > >> > >> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 5:50 PM Rémi Dettai <rdet...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> I would also vote for 16:00 UTC. > >>> > >>> Remi > >>> > >>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021, 2:01 PM Yijie Shen <henry.yijies...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> 4:00, 10:00, and 16:00 in UTC works for me as well :D > >>>> > >>>> On 2021/09/19 10:32:03 Wayne Xia wrote: > >>>>> I vote for 4:00, 10:00 and 16:00 (in UTC) > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:27 PM Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> It sounds like there are enough people to make it worth organizing > at > >>>> least > >>>>>> a few. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I would be happy to organize a zoom meeting to facilitate this. > >>>> Previously > >>>>>> the schedule was every other Wednesday at 12 Noon Eastern Time, > >>> which I > >>>>>> realize may be a tough time for some, especially those in Asia. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Could people please respond with their preference: > >>>>>> A) 4:00 UTC > >>>>>> A) 10:00 UTC > >>>>>> B) 16:00 UTC > >>>>>> D) 22:00 UTC > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Andrew > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:07 AM Yijie Shen < > >>> henry.yijies...@gmail.com> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I have received a lot of great help since I started working on > >>>>>> DataFusion. > >>>>>>> It will be fantastic to have an opportunity to communicate with > >>>> community > >>>>>>> members "face to face". > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Best, > >>>>>>> Yijie > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On 2021/09/17 03:58:10 QP Hou wrote: > >>>>>>>> I would be interested in meeting with more contributors "face to > >>>> face" > >>>>>>>> and chime in to help move these major initiatives forward in any > >>>> way I > >>>>>>>> can :) > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> QP > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 6:55 AM Rémi Dettai <rdet...@gmail.com> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I am also very interested in re-instoring these events, at > >>> least > >>>>>>>>> occasionally. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I do think that sharing some higher level goals and ideas in > >>> more > >>>>>>> *informal > >>>>>>>>> *discussions could help us understand each other better in our > >>>>>>> asynchronous > >>>>>>>>> work (design documents, issues, PRs). > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> I also agree that no decision should be taken during these > >>>> calls. An > >>>>>>>>> interesting format could be that each time, one or two > >>>> participants, > >>>>>>> on a > >>>>>>>>> volunteering basis, share a small presentation of their work > >>>>>> on/around > >>>>>>>>> Arrow/Datafusion, the time they have available to spend on it, > >>>> maybe > >>>>>>> their > >>>>>>>>> overall vision of what they would like the project to become... > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Remi > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Le jeu. 16 sept. 2021 à 15:37, Andrew Lamb < > >>> al...@influxdata.com> > >>>> a > >>>>>>> écrit : > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> A lot has been happening in DataFusion and Arrow since we > >>>>>> stopped > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>>> Rust specific sync calls (see mailing list thread [1] on the > >>>>>> topic). > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I would like to gauge interest in restarting the calls > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> I think a call could be valuable to: > >>>>>>>>>> 1. Help "put a face to the name" of some of other > >>> contributors > >>>> we > >>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>>> working with > >>>>>>>>>> 2. Discuss / synchronize on the goals and major initiatives > >>>> from > >>>>>>> different > >>>>>>>>>> stakeholders to identify areas where more alignment is needed > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Recent areas I am thinking about that might benefit from some > >>>> in > >>>>>>> person > >>>>>>>>>> discussion are the object store API [2] and table provider > >>>> splits > >>>>>>> [3]. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> As always, we would ensure that minutes are sent out, no > >>>> decisions > >>>>>>> are > >>>>>>>>>> made on the call and anything of substance was discussed on > >>>> this > >>>>>>> mailing > >>>>>>>>>> list or in github issues / google docs. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Andrew > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [1] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rbeadc3b11bce8731c69617c8e0fe780a97055de0fcd739c378d9c0e1%40%3Cdev.arrow.apache.org%3E > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/pull/950 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> [3] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1009 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >
