Sorry, that should be a -1 because of the bug On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 at 09:42, Neville Dipale <nevilled...@gmail.com> wrote:
> [X] +0 binding > > There's a test failure on aarch64, I've opened > https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/1294 > > thread > 'util::bit_chunk_iterator::tests::test_unaligned_bit_chunk_iterator' > panicked at 'assertion failed: ALIGNMENT > 64', > arrow/src/util/bit_chunk_iterator.rs:470:9 > > On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 at 18:57, Andrew Lamb <al...@influxdata.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation, >> version 9.0.2. >> >> This is the third RC[5] for the 9.x version. While somewhat inconvenient >> I >> am happy to say our process has found and prevented two critical bugs >> prior >> from being released! I hope that "third time's the charm" this time. >> >> This release candidate is based on commit: >> ab7c2904ccc03d0c05687ef416fbc5f4ed92f125 [1] >> >> The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2]. >> >> The changelog is located at [3]. >> >> Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests, >> and vote on the release. There is a script [4] that automates some of >> the verification. >> >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >> >> [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Rust >> [ ] +0 >> [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Rust because... >> >> [1]: >> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/tree/ab7c2904ccc03d0c05687ef416fbc5f4ed92f125 >> [2]: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-rs-9.0.2-rc3 >> [3]: >> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/ab7c2904ccc03d0c05687ef416fbc5f4ed92f125/CHANGELOG.md >> [4]: >> >> https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/blob/master/dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh >> [5]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/gtvv5okt49jyr0hxn5kho7vwp25rz5dk >> --------------------------------------------------------- >> Running rat license checker on >> >> /Users/alamb/Software/arrow-rs/dev/dist/apache-arrow-rs-9.0.2-rc3/apache-arrow-rs-9.0.2.tar.gz >> >
