> > Note this wording talks about "two reference implementations" not "*the* > two reference implementations". So there can be more than two reference > implementations.
Maybe reference implementation is the wrong wording here. My main concern is that we try to maintain two "feature complete" implementations at all times. I worry if there is a pick 2 from N reference implementations that potentially leads to fragmentation more quickly. But maybe this is premature? Cheers, Micah On Fri, Jan 6, 2023 at 10:02 AM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > Le 06/01/2023 à 18:58, Micah Kornfield a écrit : > > I'm having trouble finding it, but I think we've previously agreed that > new > > features needed implementations in 2 reference implementations before > > approval (I had thought the community agreed on Java and C++ as the two > > implementations but I can't find the vote thread on it). > > Note this wording talks about "two reference implementations" not "*the* > two reference implementations". So there can be more than two reference > implementations. > > Regards > > Antoine. >
