Ah, right. I haven't written up the last set of ADBC proposals yet. I'll do that in the next day or two.
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023, at 17:38, Will Jones wrote: > Hi David, > > The proposals in the Flight/Flight SQL document look excellent. As I've > been looking at ADBC I've been wondering about polling / async execution, > cancellation, and progress indicators. Glad to see those in the Flight > document, but where are they in the ADBC issues? Do they still need to be > created? > > Best, > > Will Jones > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 12:58 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> I would like to submit some Flight RPC and Flight SQL enhancements for >> discussion. They cover the following: >> >> - Executing 'queries' in a retryable, nonblocking way >> - Handling ordered result sets >> - Handling expiration of/re-reading result sets >> >> In addition, there are corresponding proposals for ADBC in anticipation of >> these features, James's catalogs proposal for Flight SQL, and other >> feedback. >> >> The Flight proposals are described in this document [1]. It should be open >> for comments. >> The ADBC proposals are filed as individual issues in this milestone [2]. >> >> Any feedback is much appreciated. There are not yet prototype >> implementations, but if there is a rough consensus then I can begin on that. >> >> [1]: >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jhPyPZSOo2iy0LqIJVUs9KWPyFULVFJXTILDfkadx2g/edit?usp=sharing >> [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/milestone/3 >> >> Thanks, >> David >>
