Hmmm, I'm also on MacOS m1, but didn't have any issues running tests.
David, is the error reproducible? We fixed an issue for this in [this
commit](
https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/commit/6d0ac4946f062414e2b60aa3d67c2875bb2e7958),
but it's possible that our check for this condition wasn't strong enough or
something. If it's reproducible, I'd appreciate being able to do a debug
build for you and have it report some data around our check for this.
-Jacob
On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 6:36 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote:
> I had an issue during verification (macOS/AArch64) [1]
>
> The gist seems to be:
>
> ```
> nested task error: ArgumentError: unsafe_wrap: pointer 0x293389438
> is not properly aligned to 16 bytes
> Stacktrace:
> [1] #unsafe_wrap#100
> @ ./pointer.jl:92 [inlined]
> [2] unsafe_wrap
> @ ./pointer.jl:90 [inlined]
> [3] reinterp(#unused#::Type{Arrow.Decimal{2, 2, Int128}},
> batch::Arrow.Batch, buf::Arrow.Flatbuf.Buffer,
> compression::Arrow.Flatbuf.BodyCompression)
> @ Arrow
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:557
> [4] build(f::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, #unused#::Arrow.Flatbuf.Decimal,
> batch::Arrow.Batch, rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64,
> Arrow.DictEncoding}, nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
> @ Arrow
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:685
> [5] build(field::Arrow.Flatbuf.Field, batch::Arrow.Batch,
> rb::Arrow.Flatbuf.RecordBatch, de::Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
> nodeidx::Int64, bufferidx::Int64, convert::Bool)
> @ Arrow
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:498
> [6] iterate(x::Arrow.VectorIterator, ::Tuple{Int64, Int64, Int64})
> @ Arrow
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:474
> [7] iterate
> @
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:471
> [inlined]
> [8] copyto!(dest::Vector{Any}, src::Arrow.VectorIterator)
> @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:946
> [9] _collect
> @ ./array.jl:713 [inlined]
> [10] collect
> @ ./array.jl:707 [inlined]
> [11] macro expansion
> @
> ~/Code/arrow-julia/verification/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1/src/table.jl:376
> [inlined]
> [12] (::Arrow.var"#108#114"{Bool, Channel{Any},
> WorkerUtilities.OrderedSynchronizer, Dict{Int64, Arrow.DictEncoding},
> Arrow.Batch, Int64})()
> @ Arrow ./threadingconstructs.jl:341
> ```
>
> I haven't gotten a chance to look more into it/try again.
>
> [1]: https://gist.github.com/lidavidm/b8f604b60c0a2cdfb04e96d4e58bdfdb
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023, at 06:50, Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose the following release candidate (RC1) of
> > Apache Arrow Julia version 2.5.1.
> >
> > This release candidate is based on commit:
> > 22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9 [1]
> >
> > The source release rc1 is hosted at [2].
> >
> > Please download, verify checksums and signatures, run the unit tests,
> > and vote on the release. See [3] for how to validate a release candidate.
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 24 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not release this as Apache Arrow Julia 2.5.1 because...
> >
> > [1]:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/tree/22088f1cb59bcd99fbffbf9d8248e491690dbfd9
> > [2]:
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/arrow/apache-arrow-julia-2.5.1-rc1/
> > [3]:
> >
> https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/blob/main/dev/release/README.md#verify
>
