Just to follow up with this thread, the blog post is now live: https://arrow.apache.org/blog/2023/05/04/adopting-apache-arrow-at-cloudquery/
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 8:09 PM Neal Richardson <neal.p.richard...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for following up on this. Just a point of order: I don't think PMC > approval or voting is required to merge to arrow-site. Though I agree that > it's always good to get more eyes on things we publish to the web. > > Neal > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 6:33 PM Will Jones <will.jones...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Thanks for highlighting this, Matt. > > > > I have added some comments in the document. > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 2:34 PM Ian Cook <i...@ursacomputing.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Matt, > > > > > > I reviewed it and left a few very minor comments. Looks great to me. > > > > > > Do any PMC members wish to chime in? If not, it seems OK to give it 72 > > > hours from the time of your email here and then merge it. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Ian > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 11:41 AM Matt Topol <zotthewiz...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hey All, > > > > > > > > Yevgeny Pats has contributed a blog post to the Arrow Site via PR[1]. > > > > detailing his company's usage of Arrow for their type system. I've > > > reviewed > > > > it and it looks good to me, but as I'm not a PMC member I didn't want > > to > > > go > > > > merging it and having it get published without input from others > first > > > > along with potentially coordinating *when* we should merge it to > > publish. > > > > > > > > So I'm hoping I can get a bit more eyes on this to give it a look > over. > > > > > > > > Thanks all! > > > > > > > > --Matt > > > > > > > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-site/pull/348 > > > > > >
