+1 Thanks kou!
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023, 10:33 AM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 > > Thanks Kou! > > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023, at 21:31, Sutou Kouhei wrote: > > +1 > > > > In <20230628.103017.2111667987485891680....@clear-code.com> > > "[VOTE][Format][Flight] Result set expiration support" on Wed, 28 Jun > > 2023 10:30:17 +0900 (JST), > > Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to propose result set expiration support for > >> Flight RPC. > >> > >> See the following pull request and discussion for details: > >> > >> * GH-35500: [C++][Go][Java][FlightRPC] Add support for result set > expiration > >> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36009 > >> > >> * [DISCUSS][Format][Flight] Result set expiration support > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/48fqd554gkqrrld8k13l3b8trz5gk7ow > >> > >> This is based on one of the following proposals: > >> > >> [DISCUSS] Flight RPC/Flight SQL/ADBC enhancements > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/247z3t06mf132nocngc1jkp3oqglz7jp > >> > >> Google Docs: (Arrow ML) Arrow Flight RPC/Flight SQL Proposals > >> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jhPyPZSOo2iy0LqIJVUs9KWPyFULVFJXTILDfkadx2g/edit#heading=h.h2ein4otvhtq > >> > >> Summary: > >> > >> * Background: Currently, it is undefined whether a client > >> can call DoGet more than once. Clients may want to retry > >> requests, and servers may not want to persist a query > >> result forever. > >> > >> * Proposal: Add an expiration time to FlightEndpoint. If > >> present, clients may assume they can retry DoGet > >> requests. Otherwise, clients should avoid retrying DoGet > >> requests. > >> > >> NOTE: This proposal is "not" a full retry protocol. > >> > >> * Changes: > >> * Add FlightEndpoint.expiration_time field > >> > >> * Add the following pre-defined actions: > >> * CancelFlightInfo: Asynchronously cancel the execution > >> of a distributed query. (Replaces the equivalent > >> Flight SQL action.) > >> * RenewFlightEndpoint: Request an extension of the > >> expiration of a FlightEndpoint. > >> > >> * This proposal does NOT break a backward > >> compatibility: > >> > >> * Flight RPC: Because clients can ignore > >> FlightEndpoint.expiration_time. > >> > >> * Flight SQL: Because we deprecate existing CancelQuery > >> action but it still available. > >> > >> * The pull request includes reference implementations for > >> C++, Go and Java. > >> > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >> > >> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal > >> [ ] +0 > >> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> -- > >> kou >
