Don't we need another implementation (if we count the Go codegen as one implementation)?
On Tue, Sep 12, 2023, at 11:48, Matt Topol wrote: > Hey all, > > I would like to propose adding a new app_metadata field to both the > FlightInfo and FlightEndpoint message types of the Arrow Flight protocol. > There has been discussion of doing so for a while and has now been brought > back up in regards to [1]. More specifically, this enables adding > application defined metadata for FlightSQL (by way of FlightInfo) which can > then be utilized to pass information such as QueryID, QueryCost, etc. > > I've put up a PR to add this at [2]. > > The vote will be open for at least 24 hours: > > [ ] +1 Add these fields to the Arrow Flight RPC protocol > [ ] +0 > [ ] -1 Do not add these fields to the Arrow Flight RPC protocol because.... > > Thanks much! > --Matt > > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/37635 > [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/37679
