+1
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 10:44, Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > > +1 from me. > > But I also reiterate my plea that these existing parsers get fixed so as > to entirely validate the format string instead of stopping early. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > Le 06/10/2023 à 23:26, Felipe Oliveira Carvalho a écrit : > > Hello, > > > > I'm writing to propose "+vl" and "+vL" as format strings for list-view and > > large list-view arrays passing through the Arrow C data interface [1]. > > > > The previous proposal was considered a bad idea because existing parsers of > > these format strings might be looking at only the first `l` (or `L`) after > > the `+` and assuming the classic list format from that alone, so now I'm > > proposing we start with a `+v` as this prefix is not shared with any other > > existing type so far. > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 - I'm in favor of this new C Data Format string > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 - I'm against adding this new format string because.... > > > > Thanks everyone! > > > > -- > > Felipe > > > > [1] https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/CDataInterface.html > >
