At this point we depend on it heavily :) +1
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 4:06 PM Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > > In <[email protected]> > "[DISCUSS] Flight SQL as experimental" on Wed, 06 Dec 2023 12:59:54 > -0500, > "David Li" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Flight SQL has been marked 'experimental' since the beginning. Given > that it's now used by a few systems for a few years now, should we remove > this qualifier? I don't expect us to be making breaking changes anymore. > > > > This came up in a GitHub PR: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/39040 > > > > -David >
