I would like to see the same Antoine, currently given the lack of engagement (both for OR against) I was going to take the silence as assent and hope for non-Voltron Data PMC members to vote in this.
If anyone has any suggestions on how we could potentially generate more engagement and discussion on this, please let me know as I want as many parties in the community as possible to be part of this. Thanks everyone. --Matt On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 12:48 PM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'd really like to see more engagement and criticism from non-Voltron > Data parties before this is formally adopted as an Arrow spec. > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > Le 27/02/2024 à 18:35, Matt Topol a écrit : > > Hey all, > > > > I'd like to propose a vote for us to officially adopt the protocol > > described in the google doc[1] for Dissociated Arrow IPC Transports. This > > proposal was originally discussed at [2]. Once this proposal is adopted, > I > > will work on adding the necessary documentation to the Arrow website > along > > with examples etc. > > > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Accept this Proposal > > [ ] +0 > > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... > > > > Thank you everyone! > > > > --Matt > > > > [1]: > > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zHbnyK1r6KHpMOtEdIg1EZKNzHx-MVgUMOzB87GuXyk/edit#heading=h.38515dnp2bdb > > [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/tn5wt4p52f6kqjtx3tjxqd9122n4pf94 > > >
