Hi, We fairly recently merged a PR to remove the experimental status for Flight SQL from maven: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/39040
However our public documentation still has a warning saying Flight SQL is experimental: https://arrow.apache.org/docs/format/FlightSql.html “Flight SQL is experimental and changes to the protocol may still be made.” Should we rephrase this? This being a warning and being experimental can lead potential users into thinking the protocol is unstable. Perhaps take it out of the warning note and say: “Flight SQL is continuing to evolve with new functionality. However clients only need to be updated to take advantage of new features and a Flight SQL version update will not break existing clients”. Perhaps there’s better wording to indicate that Flight SQL won’t get breaking changes.
