The vote passes with 4 binding, 2 non-binding +1 votes. Thanks everyone!

On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 2:23 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> wrote:

> +1 (non binding)
>
> It sounds good to me. Maybe with to update documentation ?
>
> Thanks
> Regards
> JB
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 1:01 PM Joel Lubinitsky <joell...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to propose a change to the ADBC specification that
> introduces
> > 5 new standard info codes and formalizes 3 existing option keys.
> >
> > The info codes being introduced are:
> > - ADBC_INFO_VENDOR_READ_ONLY 3
> > - ADBC_INFO_VENDOR_SQL 4
> > - ADBC_INFO_VENDOR_SUBSTRAIT 5
> > - ADBC_INFO_VENDOR_SUBSTRAIT_MIN_VERSION 6
> > - ADBC_INFO_VENDOR_SUBSTRAIT_MAX_VERSION 7
> >
> > The option keys have been in use (defined in options.h) and are being
> moved
> > to adbc.h:
> > - ADBC_INGEST_OPTION_TARGET_CATALOG "adbc.ingest.target_catalog"
> > - ADBC_INGEST_OPTION_TARGET_DB_SCHEMA "adbc.ingest.target_db_schema"
> > - ADBC_INGEST_OPTION_TEMPORARY "adbc.ingest.temporary"
> >
> > The change is described in this issue [0] and an implementation is
> included
> > in this PR [1].
> >
> > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Add these info codes and options keys to the ADBC spec
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do not add these to the ADBC spec because...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Joel
> >
> > [0]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/issues/1650
> > [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/1649
>

Reply via email to