OK. I'll use "+1 (binding)" style. In <as2pr05mb102470a2d103bd9c91e4dbc4fa2...@as2pr05mb10247.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> "Re: AW: Personal feedback on your last release on Apache Arrow ADBC 0.11.0" on Thu, 18 Apr 2024 06:40:00 +0000, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote:
> Hi all, > > No need to apologize. It was me who didn't find you. Guess when you go > through all vote threads of one third of all apache projects in a couple of > days, that can happen. > > But yes: adding that "binding" for pmc members is always a good idea. > > Chris > > Gesendet von Outlook für Android<https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > ________________________________ > From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> > Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2024 7:18:00 AM > To: dev@arrow.apache.org <dev@arrow.apache.org> > Cc: lidav...@apache.org <lidav...@apache.org>; cd...@apache.org > <cd...@apache.org> > Subject: Re: AW: Personal feedback on your last release on Apache Arrow ADBC > 0.11.0 > > Something that I do on releases is to count the binding/non binding > vote in the result email (to have a clear result). > > Something like: > > "The vote passed with the following result: > +1 (binding): foo, bar > +1 (non binding): other, other > No other vote. > " > > Regards > JB > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 1:54 AM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Sorry for confusing by me... My country (Japan) uses >> "${FAMILY_NAME} ${FIRST_NAME}" order for name. I found a >> recommendation[1] from my country that "${FAMILY_NAME} >> ${FIRST_NAME}" is preferred to "${FIRST_NAME} >> ${FAMILY_NAME}" in English context too. So I changed to use >> the "${FAMILY_NAME} ${FIRST_NAME}" style a few years ago. >> >> [1] >> https://www.bunka.go.jp/kokugo_nihongo/sisaku/joho/joho/kakuki/22/tosin04/17.html >> >> But I couldn't change the "Public name" field by >> https://id.apache.org/ . So >> https://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?uid=kou still uses >> the "${FIRST_NAME} ${FAMILY_NAME}" style. >> >> >> Should I use "+1 (binding)" instead of just "+1" to avoid >> this confusion? >> >> >> Thanks, >> -- >> kou >> >> In >> >> <as2pr05mb102478736f4542dd0e7120ee8a2...@as2pr05mb10247.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> >> "AW: Personal feedback on your last release on Apache Arrow ADBC 0.11.0" >> on Wed, 17 Apr 2024 08:44:10 +0000, >> Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> wrote: >> >> > When looking at whimsy, I can’t see any person named Sutou Kouhei listed >> > as member of the Arrow PMC. >> > >> > Cut that … I was looking for Sutou Kouhei, but it’s Kouhei Sutou … yeah … >> > ok … then please ignore my mumbling ;-) >> > >> > And yeah … the result now also moved to the same page … guess it was sent >> > out a while after the Announce … guess that’s why I missed it. >> > >> > Thanks for following up … >> > >> > Chris >> > >> > Von: David Li <lidav...@apache.org> >> > Datum: Mittwoch, 17. April 2024 um 10:36 >> > An: Christofer Dutz <cd...@apache.org>, dev@arrow.apache.org >> > <dev@arrow.apache.org> >> > Betreff: Re: Personal feedback on your last release on Apache Arrow ADBC >> > 0.11.0 >> > Hi Christofer, >> > >> > Sutou Kouhei is part of the PMC. >> > >> > Additionally, there is a result email: >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/gb5k69pd3k6lnbzw978fm7ppx1p9cx15 >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024, at 16:52, Christofer Dutz wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> while reviewing your projects activity in the last quarter as part of >> >> my preparation for today's borads meeting I came across your last vote >> >> on Apache Arrow ADBC 0.11.0 RC0 >> >> >> >> Technically I count only 2 binding +1 votes: >> >> - Matthew Topol >> >> - Dewey Dunnington >> >> >> >> All others are not part of the PMC. >> >> >> >> I assume the Release Manager David implicitly counted himself as +1, >> >> however does a concept of an implicit vote not exist at Apache. If you >> >> want to save sending an additional email, adding something like "this >> >> also counts as my +1 vote" to your email, or - even better - send an >> >> explicit vote email. >> >> >> >> Also would it be good to have a RESULT email containing the result of a >> >> vote. >> >> >> >> So right now we would need a third binding vote as soon as possible >> >> (Possibly also for other votes, where we had the release manager >> >> provide the missing third vote). >> >> >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> PS: Please keep me in CC as I'm not subscribed here.
