Thanks Kou! I think that sounds nice. Sent from Proton Mail for iOS On Tue, May 6, 2025 at 16:35, Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: Hi,
I can do it. If we want, I can create apache/arrow-skyhook and extract cpp/src/skyhook in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-skyhook as a standalone library. Thanks, -- kou In <CAKvA_=pPhZZfHj1cJo74an6DA=cwjj83tw4t4e8-e7b49-x...@mail.gmail.com> "Re: [C++] Deprecate Skyhook?" on Mon, 5 May 2025 12:41:14 -0700, Bryce Mecum <bryceme...@gmail.com> wrote: > Would it be possible to extract Skyhook from Arrow's build system? > Short of that, maybe just moving the Skyhook sub-tree (and related > files outside of it) into its own repo would be a start, even if it > doesn't build and we just documented that fact. i.e., make it a > source-only archive. > > On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 12:09 PM Aldrin <octalene....@pm.me.invalid> wrote: >> >> > move it into a standalone or contrib repo >> >> I would be willing to do this, but I can only imagine an approach that essentially looks like a repo that has the relevant code but is frozen on some snapshot of Arrow (or whatever version someone is willing to rebase onto, for as long as they're willing to rebase it). >> >> Is there a way to do this that doesn't essentially look like [1]? >> >> [1]: https://github.com/uccross/skyhookdm-arrow >> >> >> -Aldrin >> >> >> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 10:57, Bryce Mecum <bryceme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> +1 for deprecating. I think it would be great if we could find a >> volunteer to move it into a standalone or contrib repo so it's easy to >> find rather than removing it from the source tree. >> >> On Mon, May 5, 2025 at 1:05 AM Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: >> > >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > "Skyhook" is a little-known C++ component that interfaces Arrow with the >> > Ceph distributed filesystem. It received it last non-trivial change in 2022: >> > https://github.com/apache/arrow/commit/546c3771a209cbcac5e03cf26e07bcd8c9601d5a >> > >> > You won't find much documentation for it except for an example and some >> > API docs: >> > https://arrow.apache.org/docs/search.html?q=skyhook >> > >> > Most Google search results point to the 2022 paper that presents the >> > original work: >> > https://www.google.com/search?q=%22arrow%22+%22skyhook%22 >> > >> > A C++ code search only brings Arrow C++ itself (there are unrelated C++ >> > projects that use the word "skyhook"): >> > https://grep.app/search?f.lang.pattern=c%2B%2B&words=true&q=skyhook >> > >> > Should we deprecate the Skyhook component and remove it in a release or two? >> > >> > Regards >> > >> > Antoine. >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
