+1 (binding) On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 5:51 AM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > On Wed, May 7, 2025, at 18:08, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Le 07/05/2025 à 10:48, Raúl Cumplido a écrit : > >> Hi, > >> > >> I would like to propose splitting the JS implementation and the > >> corresponding release process to its own repository. > >> > >> Motivation: > >> > >> * We want to reduce needless major releases to avoid unnecessary user > >> burden. > >> * We want to avoid needless release tasks when releasing apache/arrow > if it > >> is not necessary. > >> > >> Approach: > >> > >> 1. Extract js/ in apache/arrow to apache/arrow-js like we did for > >> apache/arrow-go > >> * Filter js/ related commits from apache/arrow and create > >> apache/arrow-js with them like we did for apache/arrow-go > >> * Remove js/ related codes from apache/arrow > >> 2. Prepare integration test CI like apache/arrow-go does: > >> > https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/blob/21de5d0b84289a0d37974fa6bd0852407d2c0d00/.github/workflows/test.yml#L347-L402 > >> 3. Prepare release scripts based on apache/arrow-go and > apache/arrow-java. > >> > >> New release process: > >> > >> * apache/arrow-js will be released separated from apache/arrow > >> * JS committers will ask for a new Release as apache/arrow-julia > committers > >> do today: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/pull/530. There are > some > >> PMC members who will help with the apache/arrow-js release tasks as we > do > >> for apache/arrow-julia today > >> * apache/arrow releases a new major version every 3 months but > >> apache/arrow-js will use a more appropriate major release cycle based on > >> their needs > >> * apache/arrow-js can use more minor/patch releases than apache/arrow > >> > >> See also the discussion of this: > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/qpjt8ypmw1h8j1445kmn8s7wqml0cwoy > >> > >> > >> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > >> > >> [ ] +1 Accept this proposal > >> [ ] +0 > >> [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because... > >> > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Raúl > >> >
