+1 Thanks Kou and also +1 to Raúl's idea of a policy!
Am Fr., 16. Mai 2025 um 23:13 Uhr schrieb Andy Grove <andygrov...@gmail.com>: > > +1 > > Thanks Kou. > > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 7:27 AM Bryce Mecum <bryceme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thanks for this Kou. I think the change makes sense and is a good idea. > > > > On Fri, May 16, 2025 at 1:49 AM Sutou Kouhei <k...@clear-code.com> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > This is a similar discussion to the "[DISCUSS] Split Go > > > release process" thread[1], the "[DISCUSS] Split Java > > > release process" thread[2], the "[DISCUSS] Split R release > > > process" thread[3], the "[DISCUSS] Split C# release process" > > > thread[4] and the "[DISCUSS] Split JS release process" > > > thread[5]: > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/fstyfvzczntt9mpnd4f0b39lzb8cxlyf > > > [2] https://lists.apache.org/thread/b99wp2f3rjhy09sx7jqvrfqjkqn9lnyy > > > [3] https://lists.apache.org/thread/6xl7zzf9y71dpjv5dvmn3fcm7rppggzx > > > [4] https://lists.apache.org/thread/xbtq1ndjnljyo9jpm4ozblq9wx7hrc7y > > > [5] https://lists.apache.org/thread/qpjt8ypmw1h8j1445kmn8s7wqml0cwoy > > > > > > But this discussion focuses on only repository split > > > (splitting the swift/ directory in apache/arrow to > > > apache/arrow-swift) because we haven't released our Swift > > > packages yet. Our source archive includes the swift/ > > > directory but it can't be used as a Swift package. Because a > > > Swift package requires: > > > > > > * A Git repository > > > * Must have "Package.swift" at the top-level of the Git > > > repository > > > > > > See also the Swift Package Manager (SwiftPM) documentation: > > > https://www.swift.org/documentation/package-manager/ > > > > > > > > > We can add Package.swift to the top-level of apache/arrow > > > but it may not be desired. We need to create a separated > > > repository for Swift so that we release a Swift package. > > > > > > > > > Concerns: > > > * We haven't any PMC members nor committers who focus on > > > Swift yet > > > * I can keep helping the Swift implementation but more > > > helps are better > > > * ... > > > > > > > > > What do you think about this? > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -- > > > kou > >
