+1 (binding)

In <cae3n--zw8bjs+rg32tk0mnrxetof9phhx3-rupf2zyyz+ap...@mail.gmail.com>
  "[VOTE][Flight SQL] Add is_update field to 
ActionCreatePreparedStatementResult" on Wed, 8 Apr 2026 23:39:42 +0100,
  Pedro Matias <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Following the discussion in the mailing list at [0], to allow Flight SQL
> servers to communicate the proper network flow for executing a prepared
> statement (CommandPreparedStatementQuery or CommandPreparedStatementUpdate)
> to clients, I have proposed a new boolean field, is_update, be added to the
> ActionCreatePreparedStatementResult message.
> 
> This change is backward and forward compatible. Old clients ignore the
> field set by new servers (this derives directly from protobuf behavior).
> New clients can determine the path to use with their current behavior when
> running prepared statements on old servers (this needs to be handled in
> each implementation).
> 
> The spec change PR is available at [1]
> 
> I have draft PRs for implementing the change in Java (including the JDBC
> Flight SQL driver) at [2] and in Go at [3]. I also have a PR for the Go
> ADBC Flight SQL driver at [4]. Since the Python ADBC driver wraps the Go
> driver, it is also affected even though the code remained unchanged.
> 
> If this is approved, I personally commit to implementing the change in C++
> and the new FlightSQL ODBC driver (once it is released).
> 
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> [ ] +1 Accept addition of is_update field to
> ActionCreatePreparedStatementResult
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do not accept because...
> 
> PS - I am not a PMC member, but during the community meeting today Bryce
> told me I could initiate the vote myself. I read previous spec changes
> threads to get a grasp on how the process usually goes, but I apologize in
> advance if I broke any protocol with this action. Let me know if that is
> the case so I can correct my behavior.
> 
> [0] - https://lists.apache.org/thread/88msflnwkkw8t81czs2ndqhkn1fb1pxd
> [1] - https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/49498
> [2] - https://github.com/apache/arrow-java/pull/1064
> [3] - https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/pull/732
> [4] - https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/4161
> 
> Pedro

Reply via email to