Sounds like a good idea to me. We can certainly give it a try. Regards, Raúl
El vie, 6 nov 2026 a las 7:44, Jeffrey Vo (<[email protected]>) escribió: > > I'm thinking of using the Boring Cyborg app [1] to replace labeling in > arrow-rs, as Airflow does [2]. Would we like to enable this for all arrow > repos? In addition to labeling by changed files, it can add reviewers based > on labels and send a comment on first PR, among other features. > > If we're interested in this I can sen an infra ticket to enable for the > arrow repos. > > Cheers, Jeffrey > > [1]: https://github.com/kaxil/boring-cyborg > [2]: > https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/3204b6ebebbd83d69e1203a52a78e85692d2cf5f/.github/boring-cyborg.yml > > On Wed, 4 Nov 2026 at 21:18, Raúl Cumplido via dev <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Thanks Jeffrey for the ping to action. > > > > I have started moving things on the apache/arrow repo here [1] > > collecting the workflows that need migration and possible paths to > > action. > > > > Regards, > > Raúl > > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/55392 > > > > El mié, 4 nov 2026 a las 7:01, Jeffrey Vo > > (<[email protected]>) escribió: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Just want to raise awareness that the "pull_request_target" event trigger > > > for GitHub actions is slated to be restricted from December 2, with two > > > brownouts scheduled on November 9 and November 16 [1]. > > > > > > I already raised an issue for arrow-rs [2], and DataFusion and its > > related > > > projects are working on remediating this [3]. > > > > > > From a Codex scan, these arrow repos seem to still use this trigger, so > > > would recommend action to move away from using this trigger to avoid CI > > > disruption: > > > > > > - arrow > > > - arrow-java > > > - arrow-site > > > - arrow-erlang > > > > > > Cheers, Jeffrey > > > > > > [1]: > > > > > https://github.blog/changelog/2026-11-02-pull_request_target-blocked-by-default-december-2/ > > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/11615 > > > [3]: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/26406 > >
