+1

I checked things out as follows:
- Verified the signature + checksum files.
- Checked for LICENCE + NOTICE files in the archives.
- Used "mvn apache-rat:check" to check headers in the source archive.
- Ran the build from the source archive on JDK25.
- Integrated with a 2.50.0-SNAPSHOT broker build on JDK25 using
https://github.com/apache/artemis/pull/6159 along with the staging
repo and had a poke around the console.
- Ran the full test suite on the above combination.
- Checked the relocation poms staged at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheactivemq-1447
and used a simple pom to verify dependencies on the console war and
assembly zip using old GAVs got redirected to the new GAVs artifacts.

Robbie

On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 at 09:32, Andy Taylor <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I would like to propose an Artemis Console 1.5.0 release. The main
> focus of this release is rebranding and some improvements to the JMX tree.
>
> The Binary artifacts can be found at
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/artemis/artemis-console/1.5.0
>
> The Maven staging repository is here:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheartemis-1002
>
> If you would like to validate the release you can either:
>
> 1. Check out the source, build and follow the readme instructions
> (README.md) to deploy and smoke test the console.
> 2. Download the binary distribution and deploy in a web container.
> 3. Replace the console war in the latest An Artemis release or a
> build from source.
>
> I know people won't be around to validate this release so will leave the
> vote open until the new year, I just had some free time. When you can
> please:
>
> [ ] +1 approve this release [ ] +0 no opinion [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason
> why)
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Andy Taylor

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to