I agree with Dom On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 at 16:16, Domenico Francesco Bruscino < [email protected]> wrote:
> We shouldn't hold up an Apache Artemis release for the console. Let's > treat artemis-console as a standard dependency; if a critical fix is > needed later, we can just cut another Artemis release at that time. > > Domenico > > On Wed, 25 Mar 2026 at 15:14, Clebert Suconic <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I wasn't suggesting discontinuing independent releases; I just meant > > the broker could depend on the source some sort of source import. > > > > > > But if this becomes stable, I guess it's okay. > > > > > > Talking about that.. I'm looking to release a minor next week? would > > we need a release on the console? > > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 4:44 AM Andy Taylor <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > I agree with Justin, at some point the console will become table and be > > > released less often. Also it can be deployed outside of the Broker and > is > > > also consumed from NPM by HawtIO and possibly other projects. > > > > > > On Mon, 23 Mar 2026 at 18:49, Clebert Suconic < > [email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > When I wrote this, I assumed we would always be looking to improve > it.. > > > > > > > > From where I'm looking now, the broker and the console seem > > > > interconnected in terms of release cycle. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 1:07 PM Justin Bertram <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I believe the goal is for the console to reach a point of > stability so > > > > > that it is released relatively infrequently as compared to the > broker. > > > > > Assuming we reach that goal then consuming as source would seem to > be > > > > > the opposite of what we wanted. > > > > > > > > > > It is an interesting idea, though. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Justin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2026 at 11:43 AM Clebert Suconic > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Wouldn't it be possible to consume the Artemis Console as source > code > > > > > > and make the release part of the broker? > > > > > > > > > > > > Every time we release the broker we first release the console, > which > > > > > > requires a three-day vote, adding another 3 days to the process. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We could still release independently for people who want to use > the > > > > > > webconsole standalone towards multiple brokers. If there was a > > > > > > technical way to import the source code, could we have a more > > > > > > independent workflow? > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Clebert Suconic > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Clebert Suconic > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
