There’s a change that would change one aspect of this: https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1367/
Thoughts welcome. Cheers, Till On 29 Nov 2016, at 15:53, Ian Maxon wrote: > A good thought, much appreciated. I've added the two missing suffixes to > the document. > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Taewoo Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It looks good! One comment: it would be nice to add all possible suffixes >> for each index type. >> >> Common >> BLOOM_FILTER_STRING = f >> >> B-Tree >> BTREE_STRING = b >> BUDDY_BTREE_STRING = buddy >> >> Inverted Index >> DICT_BTREE_SUFFIX = b >> INVLISTS_SUFFIX = i >> DELETED_KEYS_BTREE_SUFFIX = d >> >> R-Tree >> RTREE_STRING = r >> BTREE_STRING = b >> >> >> >> Best, >> Taewoo >> >> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> I went ahead and made a quick document describing how all the storage >> files >>> get laid out, since right now I don't think anything like that exists. >> It's >>> something we should have described at least a little, as otherwise the >> only >>> way to know is to read the code. It is good to know what to expect in >> those >>> folders for diagnosing lots of storage/persistence related issues. >>> >>> The document is here: >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ASTERIXDB/ >>> AsterixDB+On-Disk+File+and+Folder+structure >>> . >>> >>> Suggestions/corrections are more than welcome of course. >>> >>> - Ian >>> >>
