Cancelling this to reroll RC1 with those two mentioned patches...

On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:52 PM, Michael Blow <[email protected]> wrote:
> [X] -1 do not release one or both packages because ...
>
> I found two issues discovered with the AsterixDB 0.9.1 RC0 source assembly:
> 1. Cannot build from 0.9.1 RC0 asterixdb source assembly due to RAT
> failure[1]
> 2. Unit test failure in asterix-app after building from source assembly[2]
>
> As the fixes are straightforward, it seems worthwhile to re-spin a RC once
> they are committed.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -MDB
>
> [1] ASTERIXDB-1870; fixed by https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1658/
> [2] fixed by https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1659/
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:02 AM Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Please verify and vote on the 2nd release of Apache AsterixDB
>>
>> The change that produced this release and the change to advance the
>> version are
>> up for review here:
>>
>> https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1654/
>> https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1655/
>>
>> To check out the release, simply fetch the review and check out the
>> fetch head like so:
>>
>> git fetch https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu:29418/asterixdb
>> refs/changes/54/1654/1 && git checkout FETCH_HEAD
>>
>> The artifacts, sha1's, and signatures are (for each artifact), are at:
>>
>> AsterixDB Source
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/apache-asterixdb-0.9.1-source-release.zip
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/apache-asterixdb-0.9.1-source-release.zip.asc
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/apache-asterixdb-0.9.1-source-release.zip.sha1
>>
>> SHA1: 704c67ee0a13e403aa7d0ad92f5f3810fdc59737
>>
>> Hyracks Source
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/apache-hyracks-0.3.1-source-release.zip
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/apache-hyracks-0.3.1-source-release.zip.asc
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/apache-hyracks-0.3.1-source-release.zip.sha1
>>
>> SHA1: 8c99a042306cf339f699951ba4a5149f2c4fe56c
>>
>> AsterixDB NCService Installer:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-server-0.9.1-binary-assembly.zip
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-server-0.9.1-binary-assembly.zip.asc
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-server-0.9.1-binary-assembly.zip.sha1
>>
>> SHA1: 15320d396d94c4a5f0f59fa01549cdb7483ef09f
>>
>> AsterixDB Managix Installer
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-installer-0.9.1-binary-assembly.zip
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-installer-0.9.1-binary-assembly.zip.asc
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-installer-0.9.1-binary-assembly.zip.sha1
>>
>> SHA1: 84620b5c6a13686e6dfde56a7e8519a6420f4917
>>
>> AsterixDB YARN Installer
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-yarn-0.9.1-binary-assembly.zip
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-yarn-0.9.1-binary-assembly.zip.asc
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-yarn-0.9.1-binary-assembly.zip.sha1
>>
>> SHA1: e6e7738f3c1b6edda9cde83e2cd76b1b016c2764
>>
>> Additionally, a staged maven repository is available at:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheasterix-1032/
>>
>> The KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can be
>> found at
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/asterixdb/KEYS
>>
>> RAT was executed as part of Maven via the RAT maven plugin, but
>> excludes files that are:
>>
>> - data for tests
>> - procedurally generated,
>> - or source files which come without a header mentioning their license,
>>   but have an explicit reference in the LICENSE file.
>>
>>
>> The vote is open for 72 hours, or until the necessary number of votes
>> (3 +1) has been reached.
>>
>> Please vote
>> [ ] +1 release these packages as Apache AsterixDB 0.9.1 and
>> Apache Hyracks 0.3.1
>> [ ] 0 No strong feeling either way
>> [ ] -1 do not release one or both packages because ...
>>
>> Thanks!
>>

Reply via email to