Sorry, that was a problem in my local dev version. +1 in this case. > On Aug 18, 2017, at 16:35, Ildar Absalyamov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > -1 > > Source artifacts: > - Verified signatures and hashes > - Verified LICENSE and NOTICE > - Verified compilation > - Verified license headers > > Binary artifacts: > - Verified Managix installer > - Went thought SQL++ Primer and noticed that the wed UI does not print > results correctly with in JSON Output format (which is a default option!). > The result is empty with "application/json” Accept header using > http://localhost:19002/query <http://localhost:19002/query> endpoint as well > as http://localhost:19002/query/service > <http://localhost:19002/query/service>. > Turns out we already have an issue for that [1]. Feels like this issue is a > blocker for the RC. > > Also the source Asterix artifact has pom.xml.versionsBackup for each project > (leftover from SNAPSHOT version pom), but I guess that does not affect he > overall validity. > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1977 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ASTERIXDB-1977> >> On Aug 18, 2017, at 13:15, Ian Maxon <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I've replaced the zip in the dist with the one in the maven repository >> and the signature checks out now for me, at least. Also note the link >> for the repository is off, it should be >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheasterix-1038/ >> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheasterix-1038/> >> , sorry about that. >> >> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Ian Maxon <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hmm. Very interesting. I'll have to investigate. Somehow the zip must >>> have become corrupt. >>> >>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Preston Carman <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> -1 >>>> >>>> I went through checking the signature and SHA1 for all the files. All >>>> but one are correct. >>>> >>>> Asterix Installer (asterix-installer-0.9.2-binary-assembly.zip) has a >>>> BAD signature and does not match the SHA1. >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 2:56 PM, Mike Carey <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> +1 from me on the release. I grabbed the NCService version and >>>>> installed/ran it and went through the SQL++ Primer on it to make sure it >>>>> all >>>>> works as advertised (including checking that the hinted queries indeed had >>>>> the hinted query plans). >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 8/7/17 5:50 PM, Ian Maxon wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi everyone, >>>>>> >>>>>> Please verify and vote on the 3rd release of Apache AsterixDB >>>>>> >>>>>> The change that produced this release and the change to advance the >>>>>> version are >>>>>> up for review here: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1924/ >>>>>> https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu/#/c/1925/ >>>>>> >>>>>> To check out the release, simply fetch the review and check out the >>>>>> fetch head like so: >>>>>> >>>>>> git fetch https://asterix-gerrit.ics.uci.edu:29418/asterixdb >>>>>> refs/changes/24/1924/1 && git checkout FETCH_HEAD >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> AsterixDB Source >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/apache-asterixdb-0.9.2-source-release.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/apache-asterixdb-0.9.2-source-release.zip.asc >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/apache-asterixdb-0.9.2-source-release.zip.sha1 >>>>>> >>>>>> SHA1:36fae3394755e86d97540b892cda6b80ee02a770 >>>>>> >>>>>> Hyracks Source >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/apache-hyracks-0.3.2-source-release.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/apache-hyracks-0.3.2-source-release.zip.asc >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/apache-hyracks-0.3.2-source-release.zip.sha1 >>>>>> >>>>>> SHA1:1984e031570ece528c7bf860c19246870b01b431 >>>>>> >>>>>> AsterixDB NCService Installer: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-server-0.9.2-binary-assembly.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-server-0.9.2-binary-assembly.zip.asc >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-server-0.9.2-binary-assembly.zip.sha1 >>>>>> >>>>>> SHA1: f9e78dbad5a4ae3626c9ada7ae9c2c3160174fc1 >>>>>> >>>>>> AsterixDB Managix Installer >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-installer-0.9.2-binary-assembly.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-installer-0.9.2-binary-assembly.zip.asc >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-installer-0.9.2-binary-assembly.zip.sha1 >>>>>> >>>>>> SHA1: 1b372af180cd65dd8f7fb015f46e29b0a1ba8ead >>>>>> >>>>>> AsterixDB YARN Installer >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-yarn-0.9.2-binary-assembly.zip >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-yarn-0.9.2-binary-assembly.zip.asc >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/asterixdb/asterix-yarn-0.9.2-binary-assembly.zip.sha1 >>>>>> >>>>>> SHA1: bd25fd68f1c783c971c1247a82ce244eabc99aaf >>>>>> >>>>>> Additionally, a staged maven repository is available at: >>>>>> >>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheasterix-1036/ >>>>>> >>>>>> The KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release can be >>>>>> found at >>>>>> >>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/asterixdb/KEYS >>>>>> >>>>>> RAT was executed as part of Maven via the RAT maven plugin, but >>>>>> excludes files that are: >>>>>> >>>>>> - data for tests >>>>>> - procedurally generated, >>>>>> - or source files which come without a header mentioning their license, >>>>>> but have an explicit reference in the LICENSE file. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours, or until the necessary number of votes >>>>>> (3 +1) has been reached. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please vote >>>>>> [ ] +1 release these packages as Apache AsterixDB 0.9.2 and >>>>>> Apache Hyracks 0.3.2 >>>>>> [ ] 0 No strong feeling either way >>>>>> [ ] -1 do not release one or both packages because ... >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks! >>>>> >>>>> > > Best regards, > Ildar >
Best regards, Ildar
