Yes, this can happen in metadata transactions. I understand some of Abdullah’s concerns in reusing the same transaction id for multiple datasets, at least from our transaction model point of view. However, I believe the newly added infrastructure to support atomic transactions on multiple datasets can be tweaked a bit to support this case. But Abdullah might have other concerns that are not related this.
Cheers, Murtadha On 17/11/2017, 11:20 AM, "Mike Carey" <[email protected]> wrote: It's not clear to me why we can't do what's said below, BTW. (@Murtadah, doesn't this sometimes happen in the land of metadata transactions now?) On 11/16/17 3:10 PM, abdullah alamoudi wrote: > We can't use the same transaction id to feed multiple datasets.
